Re:Intel Issues Updates to Protect Systems from Security Exp...
by ch4ck on Thursday January 04, 2018 @01:34PM
(#16072779)
So people can leverage the shitty design of your lock to steal goods? And it's okay because the lock is functioning as it should?
It shows how deeply embedded the idea of maintaining proper design and processes is over, going back to the drawing board and designing a secure lock.
Re:Intel Issues Updates to Protect Systems from Security Exp...
by debt on Thursday January 04, 2018 @01:46PM
(#16072896)
It's an interesting debate. But it's clear in the statement they provided, that they are laser focused on design above all else.
Literally, prioritize proper design over security and maybe even performance in some cases. Which is interesting because you'd figure at some point, the customer would be considered in the design.
Like are Intel chips designed by robots or something?
Re:Intel Issues Updates to Protect Systems from Security Exp...
by stcredzero on Friday January 05, 2018 @01:51PM
(#16080644)
So people can leverage the shitty design of your lock to steal goods? And it's okay because the lock is functioning as it should?
That's how Master Lock stays in business.
So people can leverage the poopy design of your chip to steal compromising information? And it's okay because the chip is functioning as it should?
It shows how deeply embedded the idea of maintaining proper design and processes is over, going back to the drawing board and designing a secure chip.