Re:The Case for the Subway
by electricslpnsld on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @01:46PM
(#16063776)
> I'm not sure there's such a thing as a city that's not vulnerable to at least one climate change or natural disaster threat.
Denver seems pretty safe. No earthquakes, safe from rising seas, no hurricanes or tsunamis.
True, except for freshwater availability. Denver already has to pipe water in and hope for plenty of snowmelt. Climate changes could impact that.
Yellowstone supervolcano.
Tornados? Drought?
Driving in snow.
Re:The Case for the Subway
by taoistextremist on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @03:58PM
(#16065075)
Northern cities that are more inland seem to avoid them. Maybe they have the same earthquake vulnerability you mentioned, but I think it's extremely unlikely, but there's Chicago, Detroit, Toronto, even Montreal that are able to deal with the large snowfalls they get, and in general don't seem like they'll be hit as hard by climate change-caused extreme weather as other areas.
An even worse version of the 1998 ice storm could really cripple the northern cities. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_1998_North_American_ic...
I'm not sure there's such a thing as a city that's not vulnerable to at least one climate change or natural disaster threat.