News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging ... by BinaryIdiot on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @01:36AM (#16059010)
> It seems like it's pretty hard for the government to compete with private industry in compensation. Federal pay grades are capped by Congress, and the top grade is around ~$150k a year [1]. And note that since it's the top of the scale, you have to start people off lower so that there is salary progression.

I feel like this has to be the biggest issue. When I worked in the DoD space as a constractor the amount of clearance required to work in an NSA SCIF would net a contractor a base of $160k a year (with benefits as you'd be working for a contracting company). With government employees making less to manage or do the same job as contractors, why would you stay on as a government employee? Most of the government employees I knew ended up transitioning to private companies.

Re:NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging ... by Rebelgecko on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @01:59AM (#16059106)
I think the 2 main reasons to stick around long term would be the pension and getting 6+ weeks off a year. Not many private employers do that, and I imagine it is a huge boon for retention.
Re:NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging ... by BinaryIdiot on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @05:35AM (#16059926)
Hmm yeah fair point. We had about the same time off (I worked at 3 different companies one that had less, One the same and one “unlimited” vacation) but I bet the pension is a big one.
Re:NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging ... by walshemj on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @06:46AM (#16060209)
but it is open to political risk and you have to forgo any equity participation