NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging morale, unpopular reorg

Re:NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging ... by DontGiveTwoFlux on Tuesday January 02, 2018 @10:57PM (#16058231)

The contracting company takes a significant cut of that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging ... by MrFoof on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @01:00AM (#16058850)

For hard numbers, 80% markup of wages paid out is typical (at least for large contingency recruiters and IT contractors), though it can be higher.

$250/hr billed usually results in $125-140/hr in the contractor's pocket, and $110-125/hr for the place that sent them out.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging ... by fergie on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @07:11AM (#16060332)

In my experience its about 30%(ish) to the worker gross, which means that the worker gets about 20% after tax. It can be slightly higher or lower depending on the situation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NSA’s top talent is leaving because of low pay, flagging ... by MrFoof on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @03:36PM (#16064833)

Depends on the org, and the rate. For high rates for specialists (well in excess of $250/hr), this is true (contractor sees 30-40%). For lower-end shops and lower rates (think your Robert Half, your Randstads), the contractor tends to take 50-60% of the bill rate.

My sources are VPs from some of the large contingency recruiters, founders of some mid-range consulting shops (~500 person headcount), and having to help run a smaller consulting shop (~20 employees) in the past before going fully independent.

[ Parent | on HN ]