News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A basic income experiment in Kenya by dragonwriter on Tuesday January 02, 2018 @12:11AM (#16050015)
> But then you're taxing just once. No generational transfer tax

It taxes exactly as many times as with the estate tax (or one more, since the estate tax actually misses virtually all generational transfers.)

> Keep house or car under parents' name forever.

That's a different scenario; but, again, there's a straightforward tax answer to it: treat such vehicle use the same way as it is treated with personal use of a company vehicle using the Annual Lease Value rule; the other mechanisms wouldn't apply.

> The difference comes in when you want to double tax :) If original earner pays income tax and then inheritance tax is applied - tax is paid twice.

Replacing the estate tax by taxing inheritances as income to the recipients would not reduce the scope of funds taxed both when originally received by the first owner and then again when transferred as inheritance; on the contrary, it would increase it and make it more consistent with the progressive income tax system, with the tax rate when inherited based on the total income of the heir, not the size of the estate.

Re:A basic income experiment in Kenya by mantas on Tuesday January 02, 2018 @06:46AM (#16051333)
I might be lost, but are you talking about about year-over-year real estate tax or "death tax" as in inheritance tax? My comments are based on later.

> That's a different scenario; but, again, there's a straightforward tax answer to it: treat such vehicle use the same way as it is treated with personal use of a company vehicle using the Annual Lease Value rule; the other mechanisms wouldn't apply.

Good luck trying to figure out who is the actual user of a house or a car. What if family shares the vehicle? Tax parents whenever their kid drives?

Let alone that this would, again, much more affect middle class than the uber rich.

> Replacing the estate tax by taxing inheritances as income to the recipients would not reduce the scope of funds taxed both when originally received by the first owner and then again when transferred as inheritance; on the contrary, it would increase it and make it more consistent with the progressive income tax system, with the tax rate when inherited based on the total income of the heir, not the size of the estate.

So you split inheritance on small bits before death to fly under radar. Or split inheritance to different people. Possibly consolidating it back later on. Or do the trust fund trick...