News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tiny, weird online communities made a comeback in 2017 by Splines on Monday January 01, 2018 @03:40PM (#16047919)
> they might consider the post was ill-timed, or irrelevant/pedantic, or inappropriate for any other reason in that context.

I find the current single dimensional score limiting because of this. Sometimes I want to see a funny comment, sometimes I want to see an insightful one. Scoring them equivalently doesn't really make sense.

Re:Tiny, weird online communities made a comeback in 2017 by foobarchu on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @11:31PM (#16068056)
I don't really think "scoring" comments at all makes sense. I'd much rather systems like reddit do away with downvotes and point displays entirely, and only allow you to express your desire for something to be seen by 'upvoting'. That would influence it's sorting order, but nothing else. Users no longer get the dopamine drain of seeing "-15 points" on their post, and you stop seeing people edit things with "really? downvotes?". If someone disagrees so much that they need to express it, they should reply directly to the post.

HN as it appears to regular users is pretty close to my ideal system, except that it greys out heavily downvoted posts and you can see the number of points you have personally.

Re:Tiny, weird online communities made a comeback in 2017 by A_Person on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @11:42PM (#16068091)
I can't stand comment systems with anonymous downvotes. It's like being in a group discussion, then someone else, hidden behind the curtain, calls out "You're an idiot!" Most people wouldn't stand for that. They'd say, "Come out and express your opinions, or stfu!"