Of course it is. The greater the clarity of the footage, the lower the probability that the filmed object will remain unidentified (as in Unidentified Flying Object).
If you’re on the look for unidentified things, how could anything but unclear evidence be useful?
Example:
http://www.urbanalarm.com/knowledge-base/2016/digital-chain-...
To be fair, the only thing that can be proven is that it was either filmed with that camera, or someone has extracted the private key from the device (or just tricked the signing chip to sign a custom data packet).
Ding ding ding.
Try taking a picture of a plane at a height > 3000ft with equipment available at hand (during the night) see how it looks like
https://youtube.com/results?search_query=zoom+airplane&q=zoo...
Also this is the only declassified video, I would assume better video exist but this will help ease us into acceptance.
3) equipment failure
4) mass delusion
5) error in judgement
6) the creator of the matrix messing / debugging
7) government or private company testing a new type of propulsion
Now look at all these options rationally, which ones are more likely?
The problem with the UFO evidence is, it's shitty every single time. With 4K cameras in cheap smartphones, 50x optical zoom cheap consumer cameras, cheap telescopes widely available, our UFO videos haven't gotten any better.