News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Harvey – An effort to provide a modern, distributed, 64-b... by bb88 on Friday December 22, 2017 @09:08PM (#15992507)
> we are to start phasing out C and write modern OSes in safe languages.

Linus Torvolds probably has the best answer to why not.

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1t0gfy/linus_t...

"When I read C, I know what the assembly language will look like."

Re:Harvey – An effort to provide a modern, distributed, 64-b... by cmrdporcupine on Friday December 22, 2017 @10:21PM (#15992729)
Except in this day and age reading the assembly language doesn't give you the same kind of insight into how the hardware will perform as it did 15 years ago.
Re:Harvey – An effort to provide a modern, distributed, 64-b... by minipci1321 on Saturday December 23, 2017 @07:50AM (#15993981)
Oh, it might still give the same insight -- for example, when people reading assembler today are the same ones who did that 15 years ago.
Re:Harvey – An effort to provide a modern, distributed, 64-b... by bb88 on Saturday December 23, 2017 @10:49PM (#15997822)
Or in BSD's case, 30 or 40 years ago.
Re:Harvey – An effort to provide a modern, distributed, 64-b... by pjmlp on Saturday December 23, 2017 @12:46PM (#15995259)
Only at optimization level 0 and assuming a dumb C compiler.
Re:Harvey – An effort to provide a modern, distributed, 64-b... by imtringued on Tuesday December 26, 2017 @09:12AM (#16008659)
And you're compiling to a specific architecture.