Re:Portland’s Disgraceful Anarchy
by johansch on Thursday December 21, 2017 @12:34PM
(#15980828)
How about just, you know, addressing the points the article made?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
- Because nobody ignores attribution.
- Not only is life it too short to pretend outfits that exist to promote a particular agenda are, in fact, neutral arbiters this time around, but doing so is actively empowering bad actors arguing in bad faith.
Puzzle me this: a person you know to be con-artist wants you to do something. You can't figure out an angle, but it is a weird-seeming thing to ask.
Do you ignore what you know about this person in making your decision?