How about just, you know, addressing the points the article made?
- Because nobody ignores attribution.
- Not only is life it too short to pretend outfits that exist to promote a particular agenda are, in fact, neutral arbiters this time around, but doing so is actively empowering bad actors arguing in bad faith.
Puzzle me this: a person you know to be con-artist wants you to do something. You can't figure out an angle, but it is a weird-seeming thing to ask.
Do you ignore what you know about this person in making your decision?
But, if you wanted to bet me I couldn't guess what Americans For Prosperity thinks of the tax bill without reading anything from them about it, I'd take that bet in a heartbeat.
You don't fix this by ignoring attribution or yelling at people for noting it. You also don't do so by attacking strawmen.