Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by thisisit on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @07:16AM
(#15968930)
It seems the criteria for blocking is rather discretionary. Are they going to block a site which has annoying Google ads? Frankly this seems to be another excuse to build a walled garden to try and serve their interests.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by jicks on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @07:51AM
(#15969086)
The criteria is not discretionary. They'll block ads that don't follow the guidelines defined by the Coalition for Better Ads [0] (Google is a member, but there is a lot of other members, like Facebook, ...). So yes, they'll block a site which has non-conforming Google ads.
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by SmellyGeekBoy on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @10:37AM
(#15970431)
Which of course raises the question - if they have the technology to detect these ads, why allow them on their network in the first place?
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by kodablah on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @10:00AM
(#15970050)
Depends on how you define discretionary here. I say it's discretionary if a human chooses instead of a computer with clearly defined constraints. So if it's not discretionary, can you tell me what the specific rules are for determining something is an ad as opposed to some other kind of image?
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by nailer on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @07:52AM
(#15969092)
I understand this, and believe it's true, but: gmail mobile has a full page ad asking you to download the app. I'll be surprised if Google block it.
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by scrollaway on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @07:59AM
(#15969127)
There's a difference between a site willfully destroying UX on mobile versus including a third party's paid content.
Reddit mobile also has a full page ad asking you to download the app. I also doubt Google would block that. Nothing to do with it being "Google".
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by CaptSpify on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @11:57AM
(#15971303)
I personally don't see a difference. They are putting a notice up that is trying to entice me to "buy" something. Why does it matter if it's from a 3rd party or not?
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by scrollaway on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @07:47AM
(#15969066)
> Frankly this seems to be another excuse to build a walled garden
???
How do you make the leap there? Adblocking = walled garden? Are you just picking a random buzzword?
Edit: Do the people replying to me understand the meaning of a "walled garden"?
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by rootlocus on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @08:53AM
(#15969455)
From wikipedia:
> A closed platform, walled garden or closed ecosystem[1][2] is a software system where the carrier or service provider has control over applications, content, and media, and restricts convenient access to non-approved applications or content.
Surely you can see how google having control over which ads get through and which don't fits this definition.
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by gaius on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @07:58AM
(#15969120)
They want to be the sole ad provider, is what that means
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by visarga on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @10:02AM
(#15970075)
All of the sudden Mozilla is more relevant.
Re:Google will turn on native ad-blocking in Chrome on Febru...
by manigandham on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @07:58AM
(#15969123)
Block competitors ad networks/formats while leaving their own...