Re:Tesla big battery outsmarts lumbering coal units
by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @09:02AM
(#15969510)
"Got a check" isn't the same thing. Somebody subsidized that check I think. We also have cities subsidizing aluminum recycling, which pays nobody and has no ecological benefit.
I'm just practical about what theatre I endorse, and what I skip.
Re:Tesla big battery outsmarts lumbering coal units
by pjc50 on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @09:18AM
(#15969648)
Of course, but the coal is on a favourable tax regime and the nuclear plants won't be built without subsidy either. Hinkley Point C is guaranteed a price of £92.50/MWh regardless of the market rate.
Re:Tesla big battery outsmarts lumbering coal units
by lhopki01 on Thursday December 21, 2017 @05:15AM
(#15977698)
Aluminium recycling is actually has lots of ecological benefit. It uses about 95% less energy to recycle aluminium than it does to produce it. In terms of subsidies to recycling you've chosen the item that would always be recycled no matter what.
Renewables work, have very modest maintenance requirements, and the intermittency can be managed. It's ridiculous that Australia isn't getting at least 30% of its energy from solar.