News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla big battery outsmarts lumbering coal units by pjc50 on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @06:15AM (#15968671)
Ah, the idiotic libertarian response. Just the other day I got a small cheque because I'm an investor in a local solar scheme.

Renewables work, have very modest maintenance requirements, and the intermittency can be managed. It's ridiculous that Australia isn't getting at least 30% of its energy from solar.

Re:Tesla big battery outsmarts lumbering coal units by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @09:02AM (#15969510)
"Got a check" isn't the same thing. Somebody subsidized that check I think. We also have cities subsidizing aluminum recycling, which pays nobody and has no ecological benefit.

I'm just practical about what theatre I endorse, and what I skip.

Re:Tesla big battery outsmarts lumbering coal units by pjc50 on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @09:18AM (#15969648)
Of course, but the coal is on a favourable tax regime and the nuclear plants won't be built without subsidy either. Hinkley Point C is guaranteed a price of £92.50/MWh regardless of the market rate.
Re:Tesla big battery outsmarts lumbering coal units by lhopki01 on Thursday December 21, 2017 @05:15AM (#15977698)
Aluminium recycling is actually has lots of ecological benefit. It uses about 95% less energy to recycle aluminium than it does to produce it. In terms of subsidies to recycling you've chosen the item that would always be recycled no matter what.