Re:Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains
by acobster on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @10:11PM
(#15966713)
uMatrix is also great. It does a lot of the same things NoScript does, but at a greater granularity. I still use NoScript for its XSS protection features but have the main JS-blocking feature disabled because it's redundant.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains
by interfixus on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @10:57PM
(#15966922)
It is. It does. uMatrix is probably not for the average user out there, but personally, I won't go anywhere on the web without it these days.
Keep the blacklists up to date, and have scripting completely off by default. You get granular control on a wholly different levet than offered by NoScript (which I really no longer see a need for).
Re:Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains
by youou on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @01:36AM
(#15967510)
>have scripting completely off by default
Does this mean you have the "scripts" column red and turn them on for individual sites?
Re:Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains
by interfixus on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @02:05AM
(#15967616)
That is what it means, yes. And click them on as needed, first local scripts, and then various external ones if that's not enough.
Can be a bit of a hassle for a while, but once you get permanent rulesets established for sites you frequent and more or less trust, it works like a dream. I hardly ever see an ad, and various sniffer-services (or "analytics") must somehow learn to live without a lot my traffic data.
Re:Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains
by deltaprotocol on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @02:20AM
(#15967682)
Not parent but probably yes. That's how I roll as well.
Re:Firefox 57 delays requests to tracking domains
by notyourday on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @10:15PM
(#15966731)
Interesting. I never got around to playing with uMatrix. Is it worth it considering i have a boatload of configs for sites i use with NoScript?