Re:PatentGate — Apple responded, resolved amicably
by avar on Wednesday August 11, 2010 @09:34PM
(#1596863)
A tip for crazy people on the Internet: If the worst you can say about something is that it "ignited a true blogosphere frenzy" it probably doesn't deserve the "Gate" suffix.
Re:PatentGate — Apple responded, resolved amicably
by wonderzombie on Wednesday August 11, 2010 @09:55PM
(#1596925)
Honestly, I wish we could enact a moratorium on using the -gate suffix. Things that'd warrant it would be rare enough that we could make exceptions as they arose.
Re:PatentGate — Apple responded, resolved amicably
by bombs on Wednesday August 11, 2010 @06:30PM
(#1596413)
If they had contacted their patent lawyer earlier than they had, they might have avoided jumping the gun with their first blog post and their only blog post might have been explaining why the twittersphere and blogosphere were overreacting.
Re:PatentGate — Apple responded, resolved amicably
by iviewit on Thursday August 12, 2010 @09:25AM
(#1597997)
Hmmm, wonder if Bruce Sewell, apples new counsel, who left Intel is attempting to claim he resolved the REAL PATENTGATE. Whose trying to steal my moniker of Patentgate otherwise. Right prior to Sewell's jumping from Intel, Sewell was notified of his involvement in the REAL PATENTGATE unfolding for a Trillion Dollar Heist of Intellectual Property from Iviewit Technologies and me, inventor, Eliot Bernstein. See
http://www.brucesewell.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewi...
Re:PatentGate — Apple responded, resolved amicably
by ugh on Wednesday August 11, 2010 @08:35PM
(#1596719)
It is but since the first part of the story was submitted n-times over (including comments proclaiming Apple turning evil because of the patent) I thought is was only appropriate to submit the conclusion, too.
Re:PatentGate — Apple responded, resolved amicably
by DanielBMarkham on Wednesday August 11, 2010 @08:37PM
(#1596728)
You're right -- and that's why I didn't flag.
I really wish somebody could manage to write an article that explains to folks how to read patents. I know it's boring, and we definitely need some kind of reform, but the ignorance and misinformation out there is incredible.
Also, I'd like a pony. And free money.
and
SEC Complaint @
https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgvpzjzw_9ghxg4km9
Apple too owes massive royalties to the iviewit inventors.
Eliot I. Bernstein Inventor Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL (yes, two identically named) Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL Uviewit Holdings, Inc. - DL Uview.com, Inc. – DL Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL I.C., Inc. – FL Iviewit.com LLC – DL Iviewit LLC – DL Iviewit Corporation – FL Iviewit, Inc. – FL Iviewit, Inc. – DL Iviewit Corporation 2753 N.W. 34th St. Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459 (561) 245.8588 (o) (561) 886.7628 (c) (561) 245-8644 (f) [email protected] http://www.iviewit.tv http://iviewit.tv/wordpress http://iviewit.tv/wordpresseliot
Other Websites I like: http://www.deniedpatent.com http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com http://www.judgewatch.org/index.html http://www.enddiscriminationnow.com http://www.corruptcourts.org http://www.changecourtsnow.com http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com http://www.parentadvocates.org http://www.newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com http://cuomotarp.blogspot.com http://www.disbarthefloridabar.com http://www.VoteForGreg.us Greg Fischer http://www.liberty-candidates.org/greg-fischer/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vote-For-Greg/111952178833067 http://www.killallthelawyers.ws/law (The Shakespearean Solution)
I'm not sure whether to flag, laugh, or cry.
I really wish somebody could manage to write an article that explains to folks how to read patents. I know it's boring, and we definitely need some kind of reform, but the ignorance and misinformation out there is incredible.