News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by strictnein on Friday December 15, 2017 @12:25PM (#15933358)
That paper is referenced in this story.
Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by ng-user on Friday December 15, 2017 @01:11PM (#15933763)
Amazing how people don't even open the article isn't it?

edit: opening it is the easy part, reading however proves challenging for some

Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by dang on Friday December 15, 2017 @03:50PM (#15934976)
This comment breaks the HN guidelines in spirit. Probably also in letter. Please don't do this here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by j4ship on Friday December 15, 2017 @01:29PM (#15933904)
what article? all i see are comments ... nice juicy comments
Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by kbenson on Friday December 15, 2017 @02:38PM (#15934393)
I'll often just read the comments, or read a portion of them and possibly even comment (if it's not entirely related to the submission, as discussion drifts), prior to reading the article. If what I'm commenting about is related to the article and I haven't read it (such as noting related info), I generally do a quick scan and search of the article to make sure I'm not repeating what it said.

I don't think there's anything wrong with reading comments first, and in some select cases commenting yourself. Comments are why I'm here. That said, it's worth keeping in mind whether you've read the article though and how that affects your interpretation of what you're reading, and what you want to say. Be signal, not noise (I think that's a perfect motto for HN and summarizes the rules fairly well).

Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by hjjiehebebe on Friday December 15, 2017 @03:09PM (#15934644)
I upvoted you. Sometimes we need a laugh.
Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by ouid on Friday December 15, 2017 @01:13PM (#15933785)
how do you open the article?