News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:People Don't Get the Link Between Meat Consumption and Cl... by Yusho on Friday December 15, 2017 @08:17AM (#15931554)
That's exactly why the rule of 72 should be thought more often. Just seeing how quickly the population can double at the current growth rate is an eye opener.

72 / 1.1 = 65 Years

Meat isn't the problem, endless growth is.

Re:People Don't Get the Link Between Meat Consumption and Cl... by newscracker on Friday December 15, 2017 @10:51PM (#15937445)
Population growth doesn’t remain static. It’s not going to double in the time frame you’ve projected. In fact, it’s not going to reach that figure for much longer, if at all.

Hans Rosling’s talks (on TED and YouTube) throw a lot of light on the peak population we’d likely reach, the reasons for those and also what we can do to control it (the key is educating girls). He died some months ago, but his talks and work are engaging and illuminating.

Re:People Don't Get the Link Between Meat Consumption and Cl... by nine_k on Friday December 15, 2017 @08:26AM (#15931607)
Do regions with most growth also eat most meat, per capita?
Re:People Don't Get the Link Between Meat Consumption and Cl... by Yusho on Friday December 15, 2017 @08:33AM (#15931649)
When we look at the 3 countries with the most growth in combination with meat consumption (data from wikipedia)

1. China 58.2 kg/person and year

2. India 4.4 kg/person and year

3. USA 120.2 kg/person and year

There are very big differences that have more to do with culture and income rather than growth.

sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_growth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_meat_cons...

Re:People Don't Get the Link Between Meat Consumption and Cl... by emodendroket on Friday December 15, 2017 @10:06AM (#15932295)
No.