News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:E Pur Si Muove by geofft on Thursday December 14, 2017 @02:15PM (#15925787)
There's a single democracy. There's no shortage of random polling websites. Telling me "You are ruled by this person, who was selected in a process you knew about since childhood" is one thing; telling me "This is likely true because people on this website you've never heard of say it's true" is another.

(And yes, governments where there are ad-hoc rationalizations for who gets to vote or where the procedures aren't publicly announced are in fact illegitmate and widely recognized as such.)

Re:E Pur Si Muove by dominotw on Thursday December 14, 2017 @04:21PM (#15927187)
I didn't say it was the "truth" or anything like that. What are you even saying?
Re:E Pur Si Muove by geofft on Thursday December 14, 2017 @04:45PM (#15927399)
I claimed a thing was true. You said that the results of a debate disagree with me. Either you meant that my position was likely to be untrue as a result, and in turn the position advocated by the "winner" of the debate was likely true, or you didn't mean anything relevant at all. Which is it?
Re:E Pur Si Muove by dominotw on Thursday December 14, 2017 @05:01PM (#15927562)
It merely meant lots of people were convinced that its true based on the arguments provided by side arguing for the motion.

"Undecided" went from 8% to 24% for the motion.