News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What the SATs Taught Us about Finding the Perfect Fit by gumby on Thursday December 14, 2017 @11:24AM (#15923494)
I'm not in B2C or really any consumer play, and haven't looked at SF closely. But: I assume it's an execution play.

Anybody can sell their books and electronics online (well, they could before Amazon started, yet amazon exceeded). Anybody can make clothes, yet Inditex is a monster. And why is there more than one restaurant. SF's claim is that their tech is a differentiator, and they are a tech company (unlike, say, Target or Blue Nile).

There are a couple of thoughts about "in store brand": their business plan may have required tighter control and visibility into the dimensions and materials of their product (dimension for the reasons discussed in the article and its footnotes; material because stuff that is tried on not in store and returned may need to be more durable, I don't know). It makes the plan more complex, but perhaps improves execution enough that it's worth the expense.

In the long run, if they really have a tech advantage they have the option of expanding beyond just in-house product or simply splitting into sub brands, or both.

There are no comments on this comment yet.