People don't move gold around. They trade gold IOU's which can be transferred faster than bitcoin, with far lower fees.

Occasionally they do move gold physically, like when Germany moved $27 Billion of gold from the United States & France back to Germany:

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/23/germanys-central-bank-just-s...

> People don't move gold around.

Precisely, because it's slow and expensive. If you're going to hold out transfers of IOUs in place of actual gold, that can work for any commodity; a Bitcoin IOU would function just as well as a gold IOU. As a practical example, most Bitcoin exchanges allow transfers between members instantaneously and without any notable fees. Of course, that reintroduces a trust relationship. The point of having actual gold in-hand, or actual bitcoins recorded on the blockchain, is that the transfer is completed and effectively irreversible. You don't get that with IOUs.

Would the analogy to gold IOUs then be the Lightning Network?

I would not say bitcoin is more usable then gold as gold has numerous industrial purposes (electronics, optics, thermal and electronic shielding).

If we were able to infinitely replicate gold and bitcoins, gold would still have value, bitcoins would not.

I agree with your sentiment, I should have asserted that I was thinking strictly for use as a currency.

as an aside, no one can make infinite of anything so I do not think that part of the comment applies.