News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Reading Simple Haskell. Parent comment

Re:Reading Simple Haskell by mlevental on Saturday December 09, 2017 @12:13PM (#15886747)
what exactly is crazy about this?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reading Simple Haskell by runeks on Saturday December 09, 2017 @01:25PM (#15887166)
The simplicity with which a new operator is defined.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reading Simple Haskell by akhilcacharya on Saturday December 09, 2017 @07:00PM (#15888898)
I think this is a downside. It just makes reading new code that uses esoteric symbols defined elsewhere.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reading Simple Haskell by gilmi on Sunday December 10, 2017 @03:15AM (#15890509)
This[0] operator glossary reviews the most used operators.

[0]: https://haskell-lang.org/tutorial/operators

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reading Simple Haskell by cygned on Saturday December 09, 2017 @04:47PM (#15888358)
This. Incredible elegant. I always enjoy these types of things when programming Lisp.
[ Parent | on HN ]