Re:The Latest Bull Case for Electric Cars: The Cheapest Batt...
by CapitalistCartr on Friday December 08, 2017 @09:43PM
(#15883951)
I work at a train museum. Locomotives are fundamentally different. They have to have electric traction motors to grab the rails. Weight is unimportant. 125 tons. That's a quarter million pounds, 113,400 kg. Automobiles need every weight-saving trick the engineers can pull off. Such as combination drives.
Re:The Latest Bull Case for Electric Cars: The Cheapest Batt...
by mveety on Saturday December 09, 2017 @01:58AM
(#15884654)
Also trains don't change speed super often so they can have their prime mover running in the power band all of the time. A car changes speed at lot so its more inefficient to have the prime mover running in its power band constantly to drive the generator.
Re:The Latest Bull Case for Electric Cars: The Cheapest Batt...
by geor3 on Friday December 08, 2017 @10:28PM
(#15884118)
This is one of the functions of the Chevy Volt - "...its internal combustion engine powers an electric generator to extend the vehicle's range as needed. When the engine is running it may be periodically mechanically linked (by a clutch) to a planetary gear set, and hence the output drive axle, to improve energy efficiency." -- from wikipedia page on the Volt
Even for an all-electric car, it'd be nice to have a small gas engine to drive a generator to charge the batteries if you're too far from a socket.