Re:Show HN: Effects of House and Senate Bill on California R...
by nshelly on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @07:06PM
(#15866347)
Because they want to receive the full $80k from the grant - often federal - and pay the student $25-30k. The right answer is to fix the accounting measures. For a PhD student primarily doing research which benefits the university and grantor, and taking no or few classes, why are they paying tuition? If it’s for facilities or university staff salaries, then just send the full grant to the university directly, and let the university pay the students whatever both parties see as fair.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Effects of House and Senate Bill on California R...
by UncleMeat on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @07:16PM
(#15866413)
> If it’s for facilities or university staff salaries, then just send the full grant to the university directly, and let the university pay the students whatever both parties see as fair.
This requires a change to grant structure and cannot be done unilaterally by universities.
Re:Show HN: Effects of House and Senate Bill on California R...
by seanmcdirmid on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @09:43PM
(#15867194)
Tuition waivers come out of grant overhead I think; they aren’t charged separately.