Re:P ≠ NP
by tshtf on Sunday August 08, 2010 @07:14PM
(#1586454)
Why are you skeptical of the proof to "the point of disinterest"? I would assume that a researcher with HP with a dual Ph.D.s from USC wouldn't haphazardly make such a claim.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.