News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by robotresearcher on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @01:02PM (#15863276)
A journalist did not ask the question that was on your mind. Your response: "Very dishonest magazine and culture". That's a large jump.

Culturally, calling someone dishonest, particularly a journalist or publication is a very serious claim that requires serious evidence or argument. Now we have a president who throws it around carelessly. We don't have to allow this to become normal.

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by dominotw on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @04:53PM (#15865353)
"Mr. Weinstein’s final, failed round of manipulations shows how he operated for more than three decades: by trying to turn others into instruments or shields for his behavior, according to nearly 200 interviews, internal company records and previously undisclosed emails. Almost everyone had incentives to look the other way or reasons to stay silent. " [1]

Why would Time give platform to Weinstein’s business partner Tina Brown to declare herself an innocent victim.

How do you explain it?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/weinstein%E2%80%99s-co...