News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by aplummer on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @11:55AM (#15862616)
I think you need to read the charges more closely. Sexual assault of a 14 year old is not something you can judge a persons character on solely? What in your mind would be a “deal breaker” by itself?
Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by 1337biz on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @12:20PM (#15862862)
It was 30 years ago. Even if he had killed somebody 30 years ago and lived ever since without any serious incident I would consider it to have minor relevancy for someone's character today. From a legal perspective, sure there have to be consequences. But from a moral perspective, I respect it even higher when somebody was able to change the life to the better.
Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by aplummer on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @12:55PM (#15863206)
To clarify you disagree with “an unpunished and unrepentant paedophile at the age of 30 should not be elected to office” and you actually just said that they are _improved morally your eyes by the experience_.

Just blows my mind. I can’t believe I’m on the internet arguing with such ignorant garbage.

You need to get a reality check and meet some victims mate, because that opinion is _objectively_ disgusting.

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by 1337biz on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @01:30PM (#15863561)
Your inability to tolerate different viewpoints and resulting parade of ad hominems are exactly the reason why many keep their opinions to the voting booth.
Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by messick on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @01:54PM (#15863805)
The attacks aren't ad hominem if they are "you are an abhorrent human being for considering pedophilia a 'different viewpoint'". The attack is directly against you for your terrible views. Ad hominem would be: "Your views on Net Neutrally are wrong because you and your party support child rapists".
Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by ibotty on Thursday December 07, 2017 @03:12AM (#15868497)
It's not a different viewpoint.
Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by piva00 on Thursday December 07, 2017 @02:49AM (#15868415)
Minor relevancy? They would have improved in character if they owned it when exposed and accepted whatever would be their fate. That is being moral.

Going on a concerted effort to deny their actions, diminish the victims, delegitimatise the media and further divide people IS NOT MORAL.

I hope you change your stupid point of view, it's just that: stupid.

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by binaryblitz on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @01:49PM (#15863757)
> Judging a person's character by their sexuality alone is just absurd

If you rape someone, you are a bad person. End of story. There is no _other viewpoint_. There is no _other side of the story_. I'll refrain from name calling, but I do have one request for you. Really think about what you're saying. Try to see it from the eyes of the victim. What if your mom was the one that was raped?

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by 1337biz on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @05:27PM (#15865640)
You might say he brutally raped a child and is a pedophile.

I say he dated a teenager who told him on the 2rd date that she is actually 14 but they both undressed and he 'touched her over her bra and underpants' but drove her immediately home, after she said she didn't want to go further (not making things up - that is the official story in the Washington Post).

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by cholantesh on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @05:09PM (#15865479)
Being a child rapist is not 'having an alternative sexuality'.