Re:Reflecting on Haskell in 2017
by danpalmer on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @08:46AM
(#15860983)
Thanks for the clarification! I never thought they were not devout Haskellers, but I do always wonder about projects that fork a more standard thing for internal use ending up as poorly maintained legacy software.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
They didn't fork GHC. They wrote a new Haskell compiler to target a pre-existing runtime that existed inside the bank. For various reasons related to the runtime that meant the language had to be strict. Mu's creation was, in fact, a step away from legacy.