C++17 Standard Published

Re:C++17 Standard Published by systems on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @01:14AM (#15858960)

D is in a tough situation right now

I think its good all around and balanced languages, but, there is always a better language for any use case, where D is an alternative

Ocaml, if you want performance close to C/C++ plus and high level abstractions

Rust, if you want manual memory managment

C# and Java, if you want large ecosystems and advanced features

Also C++ is now moving and improving fast Even Ada is sort of making a come back

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by planteen on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @08:33AM (#15860910)

I'm curious about the Ada comeback - do you have any examples? I know it is still used in space & defense, but I thought those were legacy code bases.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by systems on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @10:30AM (#15861778)

Well, I would recommend you search for Spark, and check the website of AdaCore

But, I would suggest that investing in Rust might be more valuable for one's career I am learning a bit of ADA, only for educational purposes and to scratch an itch, it is very different from anything I used, and I like that

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by jordigh on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @10:07AM (#15861538)

I'd argue D is better than all of those in some ways.

D development is lively and active. I enjoy the language, and I plan to keep using it as long as I keep enjoying it.

[ Parent | on HN ]