D is in a tough situation right now
I think its good all around and balanced languages, but, there is always a better language for any use case, where D is an alternative
Ocaml, if you want performance close to C/C++ plus and high level abstractions
Rust, if you want manual memory managment
C# and Java, if you want large ecosystems and advanced features
Also C++ is now moving and improving fast Even Ada is sort of making a come back
I'm curious about the Ada comeback - do you have any examples? I know it is still used in space & defense, but I thought those were legacy code bases.
Well, I would recommend you search for Spark, and check the website of AdaCore
But, I would suggest that investing in Rust might be more valuable for one's career I am learning a bit of ADA, only for educational purposes and to scratch an itch, it is very different from anything I used, and I like that
I'd argue D is better than all of those in some ways.
D development is lively and active. I enjoy the language, and I plan to keep using it as long as I keep enjoying it.
That looks really interesting. Is this all done at compile time or runtime? After further reading the answer seems to be compile.
Re:C++17 Standard Published
by ben-schaaf on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @10:23PM
(#15858209)
Definitely compile time. D has a somewhat similar feature called contracts (https://dlang.org/spec/contracts.html) which happen at runtime, but don't influence function/template resolution.
https://dlang.org/concepts.html
You should give D metaprogramming a try. It's a whole new world, a new fantastic point of view.