So you can find a lot of people more educated than he is.
This claim is becoming cliche and wasn't a strong argument to begin with. It's an easy escape, claiming that it's a subjective thing that others can't understand and shouldn't dare criticize, out of respect. It's also a way of diverting discussion with a counter-attack.
In this case, I'm not even sure what it refers to. What parts of the GP are "Chinese culture" and what in the GP, specifically, is a 'projection' of "cultural proclivities".
Culture isn't a fixed thing; it evolves and changes all the time. Otherwise, we could say that communism, capitalism and international trade are certainly not part of Chinese culture (they are imports from the West after the end of 2,000 years of imperial China in 1911); or that democracy and freedom are (Taiwan and Hong Kong).
The Chinese educated and wealthy, for the most part, already believe they have the truth. (I'm not faulting them, in the west our wealthy and educated believe we have the truth as well. That's just how things work.)
And they don't come too much more wealthy or educated than Jack Ma.