Re:Parcel – A fast, zero configuration web application bundler
by ricardobeat on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @08:14PM
(#15857724)
Webpack doesn't seem to have a shortage of contributions. What is your real concern?
Re:Parcel – A fast, zero configuration web application bundler
by brucephillips on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @08:24PM
(#15857771)
1) A fragmentation of targets for complementary products. Any tool that must integrate with bundlers now has one more target.
2) A fragmentation of development efforts across competing projects. Webpack has many contributors, but they'd have 1 more if the author of Parcel built parallelism into Webpack instead of a new bundler.
Re:Parcel – A fast, zero configuration web application bundler
by hk__2 on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @06:01PM
(#15856926)
Yes, you can. But you can’t force them if they don’t want it.
Re:Parcel – A fast, zero configuration web application bundler
by brucephillips on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @06:09PM
(#15856992)
K. Who's forcing anyone?
Re:Parcel – A fast, zero configuration web application bundler
by hk__2 on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @06:23PM
(#15857125)
Nobody’s forcing anyone but a lot of people including the parent comment complain when someone doesn’t want to work for free on the tool they use. Encourage people if you want, but don’t complain if they don’t listen.
Re:Parcel – A fast, zero configuration web application bundler
by brucephillips on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @06:33PM
(#15857209)
By all means, do. People complain about things that make their lives worse, especially when it's avoidable, as it is in this case. There's nothing wrong with that.
You can. You can encourage developers to contribute to a single project, rather than create fragmentation, which is exactly what's happening in this forum.