Re:An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Ex...
by FireBeyond on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @02:19PM
(#15854818)
And not refuse to name banks without an NDA signed and in place...
Re:An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Ex...
by komali2 on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @02:56PM
(#15855212)
Did I misread the article, or weren't the banks they refused to name the banks involved in shutting them out of the US?
Re:An $814M Mystery Near the Heart of the Biggest Bitcoin Ex...
by FireBeyond on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @04:29PM
(#15856198)
As far as I believe Wells Fargo is the bank that severed ties:
"After Wells Fargo severed ties, Tether won’t name its banks"
"On Dec. 2, Bitfinex released a quarterly report announcing it would no longer serve U.S. customers because it’s too expensive to do business with them. This followed Wells Fargo & Co.’s decision earlier in the year to end its role as a correspondent bank through which customers in the U.S. could send money to Bitfinex and Tether’s banks in Taiwan. Bitfinex and Tether filed suit against Wells Fargo, but later withdrew the case."
"However, Ronn Torossian, a spokesman for Bitfinex and Tether, refused to identify their current banks unless a reporter signed a non-disclosure agreement, an offer that wasn’t accepted."
Contracting a reputable firm to conduct an in-depth audit and publicly releasing the results would also be a useful step.