Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by phkahler on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @12:49PM
(#15853727)
Sounds like they're talking about some newer technology that works at range, but this has been around for a long time:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosively_pumped_flux_compre...
The electrical load (output) can be a high power microwave source, or just blast out a massive EMP.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by johansch on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @12:26PM
(#15853396)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-electronics_High_Power...
Seems like the weapon can be put in cruise missiles.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by Someone on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @01:21PM
(#15854123)
I expect it must be put in something that can bring it close to its target to be effective. O(n²) power drop off for electromagnetic radiation is tough to beat at a distance of kilometers.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by mchahn on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @12:44AM
(#15858826)
O(n²) power drop off only applies to a spherical emission. Focused power drops of much more slowly.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by Someone on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @03:11AM
(#15859446)
You can get a way smaller constant, but the area of a cone still drops off as O(n²) with distance. You would need collimination to beat that, and even then, there’s atmospheric dispersion.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by blackflame7000 on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @04:40PM
(#15865256)
I suspect the key is definitely in its focusing mechanism that allows for high powered bursts to be relayed to its target with relative efficiency.
I don't see how a b52 with a kerosene powered engine is anywhere near capable of delivering that same level of radiation.