Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by mitchellberry on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @12:12PM
(#15853231)
Am just an armchair commentator but surely NK already has hardened facilities prepared for an EMP from a nuclear strike?
I don't see how a b52 with a kerosene powered engine is anywhere near capable of delivering that same level of radiation.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by phkahler on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @12:49PM
(#15853727)
Sounds like they're talking about some newer technology that works at range, but this has been around for a long time:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosively_pumped_flux_compre...
The electrical load (output) can be a high power microwave source, or just blast out a massive EMP.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by johansch on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @12:26PM
(#15853396)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-electronics_High_Power...
Seems like the weapon can be put in cruise missiles.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by Someone on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @01:21PM
(#15854123)
I expect it must be put in something that can bring it close to its target to be effective. O(n²) power drop off for electromagnetic radiation is tough to beat at a distance of kilometers.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by mchahn on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @12:44AM
(#15858826)
O(n²) power drop off only applies to a spherical emission. Focused power drops of much more slowly.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by Someone on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @03:11AM
(#15859446)
You can get a way smaller constant, but the area of a cone still drops off as O(n²) with distance. You would need collimination to beat that, and even then, there’s atmospheric dispersion.
Re:US Military's Microwave Weapon Can Fry North Korean Missi...
by blackflame7000 on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @04:40PM
(#15865256)
I suspect the key is definitely in its focusing mechanism that allows for high powered bursts to be relayed to its target with relative efficiency.
EM interference is why launch complexes use fiber. You don't want a lighting strike near a 2km cable to cause a squib to fire somewhere. Lighting protections also protect against EM attack.