News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hacking Back Makes a Comeback, But Is Still a Bad Idea by PeterisP on Monday December 04, 2017 @12:40PM (#15845723)
Pivot machines are the main reason for "hackback" policies.

If a script kiddie does something directly from his home computer, then the source of attack is clear and you can just subpoena his home address from his ISP and get a cop to educate his parents or whatever. However, if pivot machines are used, then you need to obtain data from every machine in the chain to trace the source of attack, and doing so by a chain of subpoenas is extremely slow, and compared to that hackback provides a practical (though usually not legal) option to do so.

Also, hackback provides a venue for stopping distributed attacks - if you're attacked from a large number of compromised machines, you need data from them (again, either by subpoena and physical retrieval or by hackback) to identify the command&control servers and possibly other victims.

Re:Hacking Back Makes a Comeback, But Is Still a Bad Idea by jessriedel on Monday December 04, 2017 @05:49PM (#15848291)
That makes sense, thanks. Do you know a place I could read more about motivations of this law which might discuss the important role of pivot machines?