Integrating “safe” languages into OpenBSD?

Re:Integrating “safe” languages into OpenBSD? by Santosh83 on Monday December 04, 2017 @10:48AM (#15844727)

As regards understandability and minimising "magic boxes", this means it's pretty much just core OpenBSD (kernel & base system). The moment you add the usual desktop environments or a huge monolith like Firefox, you've lost these benefits. Same with drivers. More drivers you have, more the system becomes byzantine. Keeping things minimal and well designed yet useful must be a continuing challenge for OpenBSD!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Integrating “safe” languages into OpenBSD? by anthk on Monday December 04, 2017 @05:47PM (#15848273)

1) I Think Firefox is already pledged. Firefox 57 is in current, built with Rust.

2) Nothing wrong with kernel and base. It provides the kernel, clang, X.org, documentation and BSD-games, among the rest of Unix tools.

3 The drivers are in base and NOT in a module form, as the GNU/Linux crap with incompatible vendor releases and binary blobs tied to a version.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Integrating “safe” languages into OpenBSD? by kqr on Monday December 04, 2017 @11:15AM (#15844935)

Hah. Going by the "anything you compile with a magic box becomes itself a magic box" argument, even the OpenBSD base is a magic box as soon as you run it on an x86 machine.

[ Parent | on HN ]