News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by adventured on Sunday December 03, 2017 @06:19AM (#15837104)
Amazon and Facebook could both launch entirely new browsers. Spotlight it constantly on Amazon.com or across Facebook's properties as with Chrome on Google.com.

Facebook already has far more cash and profit than they know what to do with. $38 billion currently, rapidly climbing. They'll add ~$20 billion to that in 2018. They could do a new browser just for kicks if they wanted to, and they have the vast global reach to generate some uptake.

Whether either could claw meaningful share away from Chrome is an entirely different question.

Samsung, Tencent and Alibaba all have the resources to launch entirely new browsers if it made sense.

Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by nojvek on Sunday December 03, 2017 @08:00AM (#15837395)
Hiring talent to build browsers is not as easy as throwing money.

The bottleneck is engineers who have the know how to build it.

Building your own browser could be a shitty business decision if you can't compete with Chrome for ad dollars.

A browser makes sense if you can bundle it with an OS.

Android : chrome, ios: safari and Windows: Edge

Facebook makes a shit ton of money from ads people click on chrome.

Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by rwmj on Sunday December 03, 2017 @06:31AM (#15837140)
Alibaba already have their own browser of a sort (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UC_Browser). As I understand it, it's some kind of thin mobile browser which renders on the server side.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by kinlan on Sunday December 03, 2017 @07:54AM (#15837378)
There are multiple versions of UC browser. My understanding of it is:

- uc mobile on Android now uses the blink engine, it used to use Webkit. - uc mini ( I think that's the name) has server renderer but it's "uc engine" is a derivative of gecko (not checked recently)

Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by bergie on Monday December 04, 2017 @06:12AM (#15843073)
Samsung actually has a browser: http://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/apps/samsung-internet/

Quite similar to Chrome, but has support for ad blockers etc.

Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by Mountain_Skies on Sunday December 03, 2017 @09:47AM (#15837737)
Amazon sort of has their own browser called Silk. It's based on Chromium so it's not a built from the ground up endeavor but has been customized on their Fire devices to 'enhance' the browsing experience in a way that seems to benefit Amazon.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by remir on Sunday December 03, 2017 @01:24PM (#15838718)
Samsung makes their own browser on Android.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by gruez on Sunday December 03, 2017 @01:54PM (#15838871)
it uses webkit/blink underneath, so that doesn't really count.