News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by Vinnl on Sunday December 03, 2017 @05:05AM (#15836891)
Yes, but you implied they couldn't strive for independence while doing so.

Furthermore, it's good to note that they have actually diversified: https://blog.mozilla.org/press/2014/11/new-search-strategy-f...

Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by jstewartmobile on Sunday December 03, 2017 @05:34AM (#15836975)
That is from 2014. They are back on the smack[0].

As long as search is the revenue center, there isn't much room[1] for diversification. If they need annual revenue of ~$400M to operate, it's either Google or Google.

edit: On that last point, I could be wrong. Most of the biggies could throw half a billion at them indefinitely if it served the right purpose.

[0] https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/14/mozilla-terminates-its-dea...

[1] https://www.netmarketshare.com/search-engine-market-share.as...

Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by Vinnl on Sunday December 03, 2017 @07:59AM (#15837391)
That only says they made Google the default search engine, not that they received money from them. And even if they did, that would be in addition to what they are still getting from Yahoo - the contract lasts until 2019. Mozilla simply had the option of changing the default in case of a Yahoo! acquisition by a company not in line with their values (i.e. Verizon).
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by jopsen on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @12:50AM (#15850024)
Afaik, Google is nolonger the default in all markets.