News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by Sylos on Sunday December 03, 2017 @03:36AM (#15836650)
Yes, the Android-version is also just a Blink wrapper. It's almost impossible for Microsoft to port Trident/EdgeHTML to other operating systems, because it's so deeply integrated into Windows.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by chungy on Sunday December 03, 2017 @04:02AM (#15836721)
Way back when, there were versions of IE 4, 5, and 6 for non-Windows OSes such as HP-UX, AIX, Solaris, and Mac OS (Classic and X both). It is not unreasonable that they could do it again.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by gsnedders on Sunday December 03, 2017 @04:14AM (#15836757)
Note those releases were based on an entirely different codebase to the Windows version of IE.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by thristian on Sunday December 03, 2017 @05:55AM (#15837048)
Internet Explorer for Mac was a separate codebase from the Windows version.

The Unix workstation versions (HP-UX, AIX, etc.) were built with a commercial equivalent to Winelib: a library that implemented Win32 APIs on top of Unix and X11.

I have no idea how they managed to build the IE code on a compiler that wasn't MSVC.

Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by gardnr on Sunday December 03, 2017 @03:38PM (#15839449)
When you say "entirely different" you mean they didn't even share the same rendering engine?
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by gsnedders on Sunday December 03, 2017 @05:13PM (#15839942)
The sibling suggests that non-Mac ports shared the Trident rendering engine with IE/Win. IE/Mac used Tasman, which was totally different (and was the first implementation of many CSS 3 features); as far as I'm aware there was no code shared at all between IE/Win and IE/Mac.
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by dtech on Sunday December 03, 2017 @05:11AM (#15836909)
Those were basically just independent pieces of software, and had their own set of features and bugs (IE5.5 on mac was notoriously buggy)
Re:Maintaining an Independent Browser Is Expensive by robin_reala on Sunday December 03, 2017 @05:40AM (#15836992)
5.0 and 5.1 were pretty bad. 5.2 was surprisingly standards compliant for the time (apart from `clear` inheriting, that was painful). 5.5 was a Windows only version of Trident, never available on the Mac (the Mac’s rendering engine was Tasman).