Re:Stanford University data glitch exposes truth about schol...
by matt4077 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @02:07PM
(#15833417)
Or get her into Stanford, where she'll get a $170,000 starting salary after four years, and can buy a rather pretty new car every quarter.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stanford University data glitch exposes truth about schol...
by toephu2 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @02:23PM
(#15833512)
Stanford undergrads do not make 170k base salary after graduation. Please read the article, it was talking about MBAs, specifically "12 percent of Stanford MBA graduates were hired by private equity firms, with a median starting salary of $177,500, the article said".
Re:Stanford University data glitch exposes truth about schol...
by lotsofpulp on Saturday December 02, 2017 @02:46PM
(#15833631)
But she will rub shoulders with others who are well connected and/or are likelier to have higher warning power going forward. College is important because of the network you make, not the learning, which is why exclusivity is important (for top level schools like Stanford, easily worth the sticker price).
Re:Stanford University data glitch exposes truth about schol...
by analog31 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @04:57PM
(#15834357)
Oddly enough, I made no network in while college, but learned math, physics, programming, and electronics, among other things. I think what I learned has helped me in my career.
Re:Stanford University data glitch exposes truth about schol...
by 1_2__4 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @03:52PM
(#15834019)
You vastly underestimate how far that money goes in the regions where these graduates are hired.
Re:Stanford University data glitch exposes truth about schol...
by fundingshovel on Sunday December 03, 2017 @05:26AM
(#15836955)
You mean overestimate?