News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by emmelaich on Friday December 01, 2017 @07:44PM (#15829227)
Has anyone else had the thought that physics is actually more fundamental that mathematics?

Also, read this article made me think of Feynman's advice which was something like 'look for symmetries and look for conservation'

Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by qubex on Saturday December 02, 2017 @12:05AM (#15830268)
The “look for symmetries and conservation” edict is a direct emanation of Emily Noether's (First) Theorem, which basically places conserved quantities of a system of differential equations with the symmetry groups that system must exhibit. A deep, amazing, beautiful, bi-directional relationship between differential dynamics and abstract group algebra.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by andrewflnr on Friday December 01, 2017 @08:11PM (#15829410)
Yes, but not in a way that's germane here. Physics in the sense of the workings of the world is fundamental. Physics in the sense of science practiced by humans is infamous for spherical cows, point masses and mathematical funny business. Not the same thing at all. :)
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by andrepd on Saturday December 02, 2017 @07:40AM (#15831637)
That's a discussion that doesn't make much sense.

What do you mean by "more fundamental"? The fact is physics and mathematics treat entirely different subjects. Physics treats the physical, empirical world. Mathematics is the study of formal thought. It isn't meaningful to compare them that way.

Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by gowld on Friday December 01, 2017 @08:04PM (#15829363)
Theoretical physics "shut up and calculate" is experimental mathematics.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics by tim333 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @09:26PM (#15835629)
Or perhaps at the root they are the same thing.