Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics
by qubex on Saturday December 02, 2017 @12:05AM
(#15830268)
The “look for symmetries and conservation” edict is a direct emanation of Emily Noether's (First) Theorem, which basically places conserved quantities of a system of differential equations with the symmetry groups that system must exhibit. A deep, amazing, beautiful, bi-directional relationship between differential dynamics and abstract group algebra.
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics
by andrewflnr on Friday December 01, 2017 @08:11PM
(#15829410)
Yes, but not in a way that's germane here. Physics in the sense of the workings of the world is fundamental. Physics in the sense of science practiced by humans is infamous for spherical cows, point masses and mathematical funny business. Not the same thing at all. :)
Re:Advances in number theory inspired by physics
by andrepd on Saturday December 02, 2017 @07:40AM
(#15831637)
That's a discussion that doesn't make much sense.
What do you mean by "more fundamental"? The fact is physics and mathematics treat entirely different subjects. Physics treats the physical, empirical world. Mathematics is the study of formal thought. It isn't meaningful to compare them that way.
Also, read this article made me think of Feynman's advice which was something like 'look for symmetries and look for conservation'