Re:GM says it will put fleets of self-driving cars in cities...
by LeifCarrotson on Friday December 01, 2017 @03:15PM
(#15826946)
> The NTSB does not like it because the brake lights do not turn on. I'm not having that done.
The NTSB must be ignoring the millions of manual-transmission vehicles which can be slowed down through engine braking without their brake lights turning on.
Re:GM says it will put fleets of self-driving cars in cities...
by madengr on Friday December 01, 2017 @05:09PM
(#15828112)
Sure, but they can't be brought to a stop with engine breaking.
Re:GM says it will put fleets of self-driving cars in cities...
by LeifCarrotson on Saturday December 02, 2017 @11:12AM
(#15832503)
"Braking". It can definitely come to a grinding, flaming halt with engine breaking. (Sorry, that typo is a bit of a pet peeve).
And you can easily get down to 5mph with engine braking, which is more than slow enough to be a problem if you don't have brake lights on.
Re:GM says it will put fleets of self-driving cars in cities...
by jstanley on Friday December 01, 2017 @05:09PM
(#15828113)
> tapping the brake turns on the regen in normal D mode, without moving the brake calipers.
Surely I'm not the only one terrified by this? Is there seriously a computer sitting between the pedal and the pads, and the pads don't move unless the computer says so?
Supposedly, there is a recall mandated by NTSB that will mess up this 1 pedal driving. The NTSB does not like it because the brake lights do not turn on. I'm not having that done.
What I don't like is the "creep" that they put in to emulate an automatic (torque converter).