News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube monetization analysis by DerfNet on Thursday November 30, 2017 @11:39AM (#15817104)
The only other factor I can think of with ReviewBrah is that he's often negatively reviewing products from huge companies (fast food chains) that might advertise on YouTube. Would Burger King want to run an ad before he reviews chicken fries or whatever?
Re:YouTube monetization analysis by benbenolson on Thursday November 30, 2017 @12:28PM (#15817551)
There are a huge number of other food reviewers that don't have the same issues with demonitization, even if they have slightly less ad-friendly content. That said, it's a good suggestion; it's much easier to find a way to shoot down your suggestion than it is to think of it.
Re:YouTube monetization analysis by softawre on Thursday November 30, 2017 @12:50PM (#15817762)
> it's much easier to find a way to shoot down your suggestion than it is to think of it.

words of wisdom, I would do well to remember them.

Re:YouTube monetization analysis by halflings on Thursday November 30, 2017 @01:08PM (#15817964)
Criticising products is totally fine, otherwise all video game or movie reviewers would be demonized. Demonetization is for "upsetting" content from a brand perspective (terrorism, catastrophe, sex, violence, ...), but the models get it wrong from time to time.
Re:YouTube monetization analysis by wallace_f on Thursday November 30, 2017 @09:30PM (#15821480)
If it were the case, would it be an anti-trust issue?