So identifying the customer provides the ISP with neither the identity of the person using the internet connection, nor any more information (than the service address) about how to locate the person using the internet connection.
So, even if you believe it is right and proper that ISPs are deputised to track down internet users on behalf of the government: why is it advantageous that they identify their customers?
I'm not sure what logical point you're trying to make. They've identified the user of the Internet connection; the user is the accountholder. The strong identification of that accountholder follows them if they disappear, which is useful for both receivables and security/LEO. That's the advantage.
Nope. In that case you are entirely clear unless you knew their plan in advance and still let them do it.
> Or you lend your friend your car and they go rob a bank with it
Same as above
See the Ryan Joseph Holle case from 2004