News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Islands in lakes in islands in lakes ... by pclark on Friday August 06, 2010 @08:49AM (#1580870)
over 40 people think its relevant
Re:Islands in lakes in islands in lakes ... by paulgb on Friday August 06, 2010 @08:57AM (#1580880)
True, but I bet over 40 people think it's irrelevant, too. Without downvoting, the number of votes does not imply relevance.
Re:Islands in lakes in islands in lakes ... by DrJokepu on Friday August 06, 2010 @10:00AM (#1581016)
Those people can upvote other stories they think are more relevant or interesting. The "newest" page at http://news.ycombinator.com/newest always has interesting submissions waiting to be upvoted.
Re:Islands in lakes in islands in lakes ... by shrikant on Friday August 06, 2010 @09:31AM (#1580935)
Not really - if over 40 people thought it was truly irrelevant, it would be flagged to death.
Re:Islands in lakes in islands in lakes ... by paulgb on Friday August 06, 2010 @09:44AM (#1580972)
Not all users can flag, and flagging is more to deal with spam and trolling. (The guidelines mention offtopic posts as well, but community consensus is that flagging is not downvoting.)
Re:Islands in lakes in islands in lakes ... by chc on Friday August 06, 2010 @11:51AM (#1581348)
Flagging is not downvoting, but it is the sanctioned way to register your opinion that some content does not belong on the site. If your efforts to combat off-topic posts are limited to ranting in the comments after they're posted, it's too late.
Re:Islands in lakes in islands in lakes ... by Jun8 on Friday August 06, 2010 @11:14AM (#1581235)
Well, then you have an issue not directly with this story but the way HN is designed. Start a submission of your own, citing this example, about this issue and get the discussion rolling, if you feel passionately about this.
Re:Islands in lakes in islands in lakes ... by Mz on Friday August 06, 2010 @08:53AM (#1580876)
My first thought when reading the question was "Ooh, shiny!". But I didn't think anyone would get it and it would get downvoted as smart-assed. More eloquently: I think it falls under "anything engaging" (or whatever that phrase is in the guidelines).