News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Waterfox – Firefox fork retaining XUL support by mmastrac on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @04:05PM (#15801624)
Developers are free to spend their time on whatever projects they wish, but I suspect that Waterfox users will quickly run into the tradeoffs between customizability and performance that the Firefox team made.

It's a noble effort but I suspect there just isn't a big enough community to keep a XUL-based browser (plus the extensions themselves) moving forward while being as secure, web-standard-current and fast as Firefox proper.

Re:Waterfox – Firefox fork retaining XUL support by moosingin3space on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @04:18PM (#15801800)
I'm not sure that there will be many XUL extensions left maintained after a while -- since no major browser supports them and the fact that WebExtensions is a much easier framework for development. As a result, I don't see much of a future in Firefox pre-Quantum forks.
Re:Waterfox – Firefox fork retaining XUL support by bkdbkd on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @05:00PM (#15802257)
Yes, in time there won't be any XUL extenions. But what do they say we are all supposed do with that tiny nagging:'it worked yesterday, but not today' problem?
Re:Waterfox – Firefox fork retaining XUL support by semi-extrinsic on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @05:43PM (#15802602)
Firefox's Extended Support Release, which will keep getting updates for almost a year, certainly helps.

I've been on ESR because of vimperator/pentadactyl not being portable, plus some other extensions like FoxyProxy, Tree Style Tabs etc.

But today I discovered tridactyl works well enough on latest FF to suit my vim-ish needs, while the other two have been fairly completely ported.

Re:Waterfox – Firefox fork retaining XUL support by kibwen on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @06:49PM (#15803172)
Thanks for the tip about tridactyl, I've only seen Saka Key so far in this space.
Re:Waterfox – Firefox fork retaining XUL support by michaelmrose on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @02:05AM (#15805170)
Neat saka tridactyl and vim vixen several interesting choices
Re:Waterfox – Firefox fork retaining XUL support by Elvewyn on Wednesday November 29, 2017 @09:31AM (#15807009)
I did not like Saka Key (some weird behavior sometimes), but Vim Vixen comes close to VimFx.
Re:Waterfox – Firefox fork retaining XUL support by khedoros1 on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @05:42PM (#15802591)
Plus, there's already Pale Moon, which shares a lot of the same goals that this one seems to.