> Apple only responds reliably to PR storms

They've been quick (within 45 days) to patch every major bug I've reported to them and where the bugs were cross platform, impacting Windows, Android, etc., they've consistently been amongst the quickest to issue a patch so I'm not sure how you qualify that statement.

I qualified it with "reliably". Major bugs reported by you, a security researcher, may be bucketed differently than those deemed less serious or filed by others. As a recent example, a minor bug like the iOS 11 calculator ignoring keypresses had reports filed since Beta 1, but only after it made headlines and caused Apple public embarrassment will it be addressed in the upcoming 11.2, six months later.

A calculator bug is hardly in the same ballpark.

It's worse. It shows nobody at Apple even tried to use app they are shipping.

Sorry. 45 days is not quick.

You can go about it both ways: file a bug report, put a reasonable date that you want them to fix it by. Then you can disclose it.

This happens quite often. Report a bug to Apple through CERT as an example and they run with a well known 45 day disclosure timeline. For researchers who don't want to get into vendor conflicts this is a good path because CERT ultimately holds the decision.

We need to come up with a witty name to get it fixed faster.

iRoot. uRoot. Everybody Root.

My current favorite is I am Root.

iAmroot to respect the brand policy.

AppleGate

i0wned