News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ajit Pai is right. Parent comment

Re:Ajit Pai is right by masklinn on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @01:17PM (#15799836)
That is funny, because the pre-2015 rules were only put in place in 2005, downgrading from a much more stringent regulatory environment than the post-2015 one.

And by funny I mean nonsensical.

Furthermore the 2015 move was undertaken because since 2005 the FCC had been enforcing Net Neutrality rules under Title I, but Verizon ultimately sued and in 2014 the courts decided the FCC did not have the authority to enforce these rules under Title I.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ajit Pai is right by thehardsphere on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @01:26PM (#15799927)
Really? It was my understanding that this was part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Am I mistaken?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ajit Pai is right by masklinn on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @01:47PM (#15800126)
Likely confused rather than mistaken. The Telecommunications Act set up the various titles and regulatory regimes, but the FCC decides which regime applies to whom, and until 2002 (Cable) and 2005 (dial-up and DSL) ISPs were classified as Title II, which is where the FCC put them back in 2015.

And the reason the FCC moved them back to Title II is that in 2014 the courts ruled the FCC's long-standing Net Neutrality rules could not actually be enforced under Title I.

[ Parent | on HN ]