Trying to start it again and set off the alarm? No worries! Take as much time as you need to disable the alarm before trying to start it again. After all, no one is around to stop you.
This is worse in the UK, as we have much less space, so things are much closer togeather (ie. the car, and the keys (where they are left overnight).
[0] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01HETGX00/ref=oh_aui_sear...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8pffcngJJq0
The West Midlands Police may want to ask you some questions.
“Mr. Danev said that when the teenage girl turned on her device, it amplified the distance that the car can search, which then allowed my car to talk to my key, which happened to be sitting about 50 feet away, on the kitchen counter. And just like that, open sesame.“
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/16/style/keeping-your-car-sa...
Light can move about 300 meters in one millionth of a second. It's easy enough to find a store where the parking lot is well within that distance from the middle of the store.
So whatever system that goes into place would need to possibly have accuracy down to the 1us level or smaller.
1 nanosecond is about a foot. A 100MHz clock gives us a resolution of 10 ns, which translates to 2.25 meters away by light in air.
As a backup if your fob battery is dead, you could use inductive power in the door, or just use that to begin with (still with distance-bounding).
Sell for parts, program a new key, replace the key, replace the computer, etc. There's lots of room for profit on a $40,000 vehicle.
Making car keys an IoT endpoint on a cell network strikes me as one of the worst ideas ever. It is begging for exploits and failures.
Imagine the joy the first time the owner drives outside of cell tower data range and tries to re-start the car.
I am a he, btw.
Oh, thank goodness! My faith in ycomb hackers is restored!
Now, I'm off to go work on my reading comprehension skills...
"One hacker holds a device a few feet from the victim's key, while a thief holds the other near the target car."
While this isn't awesome, it certainly limits the effectiveness. You would have to have someone waiting in a parking lot to follow the person, then another person waiting by their car.
I do have a question though...I assume these things work on challenge/response schemes. That means that even if the car is started and stolen, it could never be started again without someone tailing the owner 24/7, which makes this a neat but nearly useless hack. Am I wrong in assuming this?