News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by throwaway613834 on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:27PM (#15792196)
> Violence? [...] That is the difference between a first world country and a second or third.

"Third-world" doesn't mean what you think it means. Switzerland is a third-world country.

Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by labster on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:53PM (#15792429)
None of that Cold War pedantry. Language has evolved in the decades since the fall of the USSR. Switzerland is a first world country on the developed-developing-underdeveloped economic axis that most people mean now.
Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by bjelkeman-again on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:49PM (#15792382)
Interesting. I have never met anyone in Europe that uses the term that way, but apparently it was used that way in some contexts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World

Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by pmontra on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:52PM (#15792416)
I upvoted you for historical merit but the meaning of words change. Third world means poor countries now.
Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by throwaway613834 on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:54PM (#15792436)
> Third world means poor countries now.

A citation would be nice. Also, what countries would be second-world with that definition?

EDIT: Note that I asked what countries would be SECOND-world with this definition. Not third-world.

Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by CamelCaseName on Monday November 27, 2017 @06:10PM (#15792583)
>A citation would be nice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World

>Also, what countries would be second-world with that definition?

In present-day English, the Third World is "the developing countries of Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Africa".[1] Third world countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia, and Africa include Russia, Albania, Nigeria, India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Dominican Republic, Cuba, South Africa, and Armenia. The term usually suggests poverty and low level of industrial development and thus it is the opposite of the term developed nations. This usage is considered by some to be offensive.

Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by throwaway613834 on Monday November 27, 2017 @06:37PM (#15792809)
Re-read my comment? I asked what countries would be SECOND-world with that definition.
Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by pmontra on Tuesday November 28, 2017 @03:24AM (#15795360)
The Second World used to be the communist block [1] but not necessarily meaning that it was worse off than the First one. Western Europe had many communist/socialist parties looking forward to implementing a socialist kind society. They were thinking about it as an improvement.

About the origin of those terms see [2].

The Second World term was seldom used in Europe even during the 70s as far as I can remember. There is no more second world now. We jump straight from first to third world. It feels sadly right if we agree that the gap is widening.

By the way, nobody in Europe would think Russia is a third world country. It's first world.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_World

[2] http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/third_world_countries....

Re:Facebook users in Romania see content related to street p... by mc32 on Monday November 27, 2017 @05:49PM (#15792381)
In parlance 3rd world didn't just mean non aligned as it did in political circles, for the hoi polloi it just meant underdeveloped economy --whether that was misuse of the term is irrelevant because that's how most people used it when a politically bipolar world existed.