Arriving on the page, I'm prompted to run 11, no... 13 scripts. After allowing everything from BBC and reloading, the page is still borked and I'm prompted to run 34 scripts.

All of these third-parties surely have nothing but the best of intentions when executing code in my browser, but I'd still appreciate a simplified alternative for viewing the content.

Personally I liked it. Looking at those authentic, old, typewritten documents added a certain charm, and brought me back in time. I wish the "animated" segments were longer, and included audio, though. I was even looking for an "unmute" control on the first one.

I also thought the delivery was pretty good. But found the image quality too low to easily read the notes in the background (and would also have liked audio for the videos).

I got stuck on the Who page for a bit. I found it hard to distinguish between a white arrow and the tan background.

I won't bother to read the article anymore if the readability function in my feed reader can't fetch the content. Straight to the discussion. Life's too short.

I didn't like it either. It was slow and sluggish and the images behind the text too distracting.

At least it wasn't a slideshow just so they could show adverts though!

I quite liked it. I don't mind the BBC experimenting with new forms of presentation.

It's almost as if the website was aimed at a different target audience

It honestly made me close the tab after one "page"